SA@TAC - Interview with Ron Paul 12/31/09

“The Southern Avenger” Jack Hunter interviews Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) on 1250 AM WTMA, Charleston, South Carolina, December 31, 2009. Paul discusses national healthcare, foreign policy and non-interventionism and answers Ben Stein’s accusations of “anti-Semitism” stemming from an appearance on cnn’s Larry King Live, Monday, Dec. 28.

25 responses to “SA@TAC - Interview with Ron Paul 12/31/09”

  1. caltrop69

    If the doctors start overcharging, the government will impose price controls.

    When the government imposes price controls, shortages will result.

    When shortages result, rationing will become necessary.

    Oh wait…By suggesting that we aren’t immune to facts, I’m being a tea-bagged Nazi astroturf lover.

    I take it all back.

    What I really meant to say was, “Magical unicorns will be summoned by the government and they will make all our health ailments go away. Hallelujah!”

  2. Redthatsmyname

    Interesting idea Cameron and thanks for your civiltiy. Also, I think everyone, even alot on the far left believe in a strong national defense.

  3. Seiku

    Stop trolling.

  4. CameronAskew1

    I respectfully disagree.

    When Ron Paul talks about health care socialism, he’s right. I’m okay with socializing catastrophic expenses associated with cancer or serious illness - but socializing the health care costs of getting a physical or going in for a cough? The lines are going to be out the door and because of that, doctors will start overcharging.

    When he talks about foreign policy, he simply believes in a strong national defense. If you hit somebody, they’re going to hit you back.

  5. JohnBreadForger

    If you say so.

  6. TheDeuce45

    video google com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912# just add dots b4 google and com

  7. TheDeuce45

    bull

  8. TheDeuce45

    all of america has been and is being programmed by the media, that in turn is being controlled by the government. i probably sound like a nut to alot of u but im straight in my head. im in the army fighting a war i dont even believe in. please check out this video and please i beg of you- watch the WHOLE thing thru

  9. JohnBreadForger

    So you don’t need to understand the things you claim?

  10. majister33

    Too many cool aid drinkers out there cant understand RON PAUL’s message. I guess the masses are programed for self destruction.

  11. Redthatsmyname

    Ron Paul is the fear mongerer. Obvoiusly it is worth your time. My eyes are wide open, have been for a long time. As long as Ron Paul doesn’t control things i’m fine. Sheeple? Now I work for the CIA? Is that more Ron Paul conspiracy theories?

  12. Redthatsmyname

    I can kinda agree with the first part of that, and sometimes I think it’s impossible also.

  13. Redthatsmyname

    That’s insane. Thanks for showing us who you are.

  14. Redthatsmyname

    Hahahahahaha

  15. Redthatsmyname

    I understand everything I need to understand.

  16. Luigi84289

    What you’re basically saying is the scope of power should be kept the same and we have to have good people oversee it. The problem is that is impossible. The only sane solution is to limit the amount of power the Federal Government has.

  17. Luigi84289

    Lincoln was an insane dictator who tried to commit genocide on everybody below the Mason Dixon. He was no lover of slaves that was all a ploy to stir up chaos and control that land. Lincoln was the biggest Dictator of the 19th Century.

  18. Luigi84289

    See that argument is bullshit. It’s not even worth my time. Either you want to do things or you want a small group thousands of miles away to control everything. You’re just a blind sheeple. The changing moral Zeitgeist has made slavery a thing of the past. Fear Mongering for the big dogs that’s all your doing. Probably work for the CIA.

  19. JohnBreadForger

    I almost forgot:

    Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

    See, I can say you’re wrong, too.

  20. JohnBreadForger

    You assumed the coclusion with great conviction then.

    Note your assumption: state governments are not governments; slavery would not have ended without federal government intervention; deregulation occured.

    I explained the financial stuff and you didn’t really respond, so I take it you don’t understand the financial stuff.

  21. Redthatsmyname

    Wrong. Abe and the gov had to send the Union army into the south to kick some ass and end slavery and keep the union together. I stick by my comments on white collar crime and the rest. i haven’t assumed my conclusion, I’ve stated it with solid conviction, because it’s true.

  22. JohnBreadForger

    Slavery and such is a case of too much government. There was no deregulation of the financial sector. When there is, it increases white collar crime by decreasing competition and creating incentives for congress to treat things as “too big to fail.”

    You have assumed your conclusion in your argument.

  23. Redthatsmyname

    Wouldn’t it be nice if government was smaller. Indeed, there are areas where government could be less involved. This is where people differ. When we had less gov, we had slavery. Until fed gov stepped in , states rights allowed Jim Crow laws. Deregulation of financial institutions means more whit collar crime, look at Madoff. When the Fairness Doc ended up popped the one sided propagandists, Limbaugh, Fox entertainment news. In some areas less gov means abuse of freedoms.

  24. Deleanredtiger

    Im hoping that his son will be elected to the senate in 2010 and that Gary John will be nominated and elected president. Not Jindahl,Romney or Palin.

  25. blackmountainboar

    The leftist media pundits simply couldn’t find any dirty laundry to smear him with or careen his policies…so they constuctively kept his exposure to the American people to an absurd minimum during the 2008 Presidential campaign. I still made him my write-in candidate !

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Liberty Giveaways!